Naming it The ‘South African Strain’ Detrimental To SA’s Tourism Sector

Describing the 501Y.V2 Covid-19 variant as the ‘South African strain’ is keeping international visitors out of the country, according to the government. The international narrative which describes the 501Y.V2 Covid-19 variant as the “South African strain” has damaged tourism at a time when the travel industry can least afford it.  The 501Y.V2 variant, which is 50% more infectious than the original Covid-19 strain and more elusive to some vaccines, is erroneously referred to as the ‘South African variant’.

Brand SA and South African Tourism have been ordered to conduct a ‘robust global PR exercise’ to change the narrative and focus, instead, on the country’s sharp genomic surveillance programme. South Africa’s tourism industry, which contributed 1.5 million jobs and R425.8 billion to the economy in 2018, accounting for 8.6% of the total GDP, is largely reliant on international visitors. The global pandemic’s impact on travel, with blanket border closures and strict quarantine measures dissuading holidaymakers, has been severe.

Businesses in the tourism sector reported that revenue had more than halved, even with domestic travel allowed under the lighter levels of lockdown. Almost a third of these businesses have been forced to closed, according to a report by the Tourism Business Council of South Africa (TBCSA). While international travel restrictions were entirely responsible for tourism’s downturn in 2020, persistent health concerns continue to subdue visitors. The global vaccination drive is likely to allay these fears and, in time, support a surge in international travel.

“The inaccurate and irresponsible naming of the Covid 501Y.V2 strain as the ‘South African strain’ is detrimental to not only our country brand, but our tourism brand as well. This strain of Covid-19 has been identified in 31 other countries, but it was South Africa who had the advanced scientific surveillance to pronounce it. This country has done commendable work in managing the pandemic, and this narrative of this variant detracts from that work.” says Nonku Khumalo of SAT.

Since the discovery of 501Y.V2, dozens of countries have implemented stern travel restrictions on visitors who have travelled to or from South Africa. Brand SA has echoed Khumalo’s sentiments but adds that the mission to change the narrative will require a concerted effort by all stakeholders, including international media organisations.

“We will be collaborating with various stakeholders in driving awareness on the image and reputation of the Nation Brand domestically and internationally,” explains Brand SA’s Chief Marketing Officer, Thoko Modise.

The terminological issues, or the naming of the ‘South African’ variant, cannot be solved overnight, and will require consistent engagement through a multi-sector approach. This multi-sector approach includes enlisting a host of ‘brand ambassadors’ across 14 international hubs operated by SAT. The marketing campaign, through digital and online channels, will include education around the 501Y.V2 variant and shift focus back to South Africa’s genomic surveillance efforts.

“In these countries we have what we call ‘Hubs’ and these consist of teams on the ground,” says Khumalo of the ambassadors deployed to countries like the United States (US) and the United Kingdom (UK), which serve as key drivers to South Africa’s tourism sector.

The variant naming convention can easily be corrected when all South African stakeholders, including media, the State, and private sector operators in the tourism industry utilise their resources and platforms to positively position South Africa.